CHAPTER 23
WHAT IS THE
SANCTUARY?
THE GREAT
CONTROVERSY
Pages
418-422 all inclusive
Rebuttal By Russell
Earl Kelly, PHD
June 9,
2017
OPENING COMMENT: EGW and SDAs give the impression that all manner of sin
was confessed and atoned at the sanctuary. However, normally only accidental
sins and sins of ignorance were allowed to be atoned (Lev 4:2, 3, 12, 14; 5
1-5); Willful sins were punished by judges. There was no sacrifice prescribed
for willful sins (Ex 21: 17, 23-25; 31 14; Lev 20 2; 24:16).
GC418: The ministration of the earthly sanctuary consisted of two
divisions; the priests ministered daily in the holy place, while once a year
the high priest performed a special work of atonement in the most holy, for the
cleansing of the sanctuary.
COMMENT: Atonement and cleansing were performed every day of the year.
Atonement was pronounced after every sacrifice. The entire sanctuary was
cleansed before service (Ex 29:36; 2 Chron 29:15), lepers' houses (Lev 14:49),
Levites (Numb 8:6) and, especially, individual sins (Ps 51:2). Since there was
such a great importance placed upon clean and unclean, it is wrong to limit
cleansing to the Day of Atonement (Lev 10:10). Also, "the special work of
atonement in the most holy" is really "the special work of atonement
which began in the most holy and spread to include the entire sanctuary.
GC418 Day by day the repentant sinner brought his offerings to the door of the tabernacle, placing his hand upon the
victim's head, confessed his sin, thus in figure transferring them from himself
to the innocent sacrifice.
COMMENT: Ellen G. White often uses the unbiblical word
"transfer" in error. No sin was "transferred" to the
sacrifice! The blood of the perfect sinless substitute sacrifice (Jesus Christ)
atoned for and washed away the sin at the instant He died. Christ "did not
know sin" before or at Calvary. "God" the Father (not the sinner)
"made Him to be sin for us" (2 Cor 5:21) --- He legally imputed sin
to Christ. Christ did not become a sinner; He was affected by sin but not
infected by it. Ellen G. White errs by teaching that sins were transferred to
the innocent sacrifice.
GC418: The animal was then slain. "Without shedding of blood,"
says the apostle, there no remission of sin. "The life of the flesh is in
the blood." Leviticus 17:11.
COMMENT: Again, the instant the Substitute died, its blood atoned for and
washed away the sin. The sin itself did not enter into and defile the
sacrifice, the priest or the sanctuary. Everything and every person in the
sanctuary must maintain holiness at all times in order for the sanctuary to
function properly. Words such as "And
the priest shall make an atonement for them, and it shall be forgiven
them" occur over 40 times in Leviticus alone.
GC418: The broken law of God demanded the life of the transgressor.
COMMENT: Wrong. The broken law of God demanded either restitution equal
to itself or death would result from an imperfect sinner. If it only demanded
the life of the transgressor, then no substitute and no sacrifice would be
allowed in any religion. If it only demanded death, then of the sinner would
result in the sinner's salvation because the price had been paid. The broken
law of God demanded that payment be made which was equal to the level of the
broken law. No sinner could do this.
GC418: I, whose guilt the victim bore, was carried by the priest into the
holy place, and sprinkled before the veil, behind which was the ark containing
the law that the sinner had transgressed.
COMMENT: "No! No! No!" A thousand times "No!" The blood, representing the holy, perfect,
sinless, life of the Substitute sacrifice, was evidence (the receipt) that
the perfect redemption price had been paid. The blood recorded the finished
atonement and redemption. Jer 17:1 "The sin of Judah is written with a pen
of iron, and with the point of a diamond: it is graven upon the table of their
heart, and upon the horns of your altars."
GC418: By this ceremony the sin was, through the blood, transferred in
figure to the sanctuary.
COMMENT: Although EGW once softens the language to "record of
sins," her declaration that "sin [itself] was transferred through the
blood" is predominant. Records do not defile.
GC418 In some cases the blood was not taken into the holy place, but the
flesh was to be eaten by the priest, as Moses directed the sons of Aaron saying
“God has given it unto you to bear the iniquity of the congregation.” Leviticus
10:17. Both ceremonies alike symbolized the transfer of the sin from the
penitent to the sanctuary.
COMMENT: This is the greatest
error of the SDA view of the sanctuary. Sacrificial blood "atones," "cleans”
and “washes away” sin! (Ex 29:36; Lev 12:8; 14:20, 53; 16:30; Numb 8:21). No sin
entered the sanctuary through the atonement ritual! Sacrificial blood never “defiles”
anything! Everything about the priest, his physical body, his clothing, his
anointing, and his deportment within the sanctuary, must be holy and without
blemish! Everything about the sacrificial animal must also be “most holy” or it
would be rejected! The SDA doctrine insults the holiness of God and turns the
Most Holy Place of the entire universe into the most defiled place with the
accumulated atoned sins of every believer since Adam! (See Ex 33:22, 23; Lev
16:13; Isa 6:3-5; Lev 6:25-27; Numb 18: 9; Lev 4:20; 5:6; 6:7; 7:6; Heb 9:13,
14).
It is contradictory to
teach that everything about the sanctuary was either holy or most holy while
teaching that the priests routinely defiled it through their daily ministry of
blood.
[New paragraph]
GC418: Such
was the work that went on day by day throughout the year. The sins of Israel
were thus transferred to the sanctuary, and a special work became necessary for
their removal.
COMMENT: This
is EGW and SDA cultic doctrine at its contradictory worst. It forces them to teach that the daily
sacrifices (representing Jesus as priest, sacrifice and His blood) defiled the
sanctuary while the (same) yearly Day of Atonement sacrifice cleansed it. The
Bible does not teach that the purpose of the Day of Atonement was to remove
forgiven sins which had been placed there via sacrificial atonement blood!
GC418-419:
God commanded that an atonement be made for each of the sacred apartments.
"He shall make an atonement for the holy place because of the uncleanness
of the children of Israel, and because of their transgressions in all their
sins: and so shall he do for the tabernacle of the congregation that remaineth among them in the midst of
their uncleanness.' An atonement was also to be made for the altar "to
cleanse it, and hallow it from the uncleanness of the children of Israel."
Leviticus 16:16, 19.
COMMENT: There
is a serious problem here for SDAs. While completely ignoring the necessary
cleansing of the holy place, altar and the remainder of the sanctuary, SDAs teach
that the cleansing of the Most Holy Place has lasted over 170 years already. This
questions the Omniscience of Christ. Also, since (they teach) Christ
immediately began ministering inside the holy place at His ascension, no
cleansing was made for the remainder of the sanctuary.
GC419: Once
a year, on the great Day of Atonement, the [high] priest entered the most holy place
for the cleansing of the sanctuary. The work there performed completed the
yearly round of ministration. On the Day of Atonement two kids of the goats
were brought to the door of the tabernacle, and lots were cast upon them,
"one for the Lord and the other lot for the scapegoat." Verse 8.
COMMENT: No
mention is made of the high priest's personal sin offering because such is not
pattern fulfillment (16:3, 6). Neither is mention made that both goats from the
congregation were for one sin-offering (16:5) as this disagrees with the SDA
interpretation of the scapegoat at Satan.
GC419: The
goat upon which fell the lot for the Lord was to be slain as a sin offering for
the people.
COMMENT: When
both goats were presented before the LORD for one sin offerings (Lev 16:5, 7),
both goats became most holy (Nu 18:9). Both goats were equal because the lot
could have fallen on either (16:8). The first goat would immediately die for
the LORD (16:8, 9); the second goat became a living sacrifice to carry the
memory of sins away (16:10; Heb 8:12). Compare Leviticus 14:54.
GC419: And
the priest was to bring his blood within the veil and sprinkle it upon the
mercy seat and before the mercy seat. The blood was also to be sprinkled upon
the altar of incense which was before the veil.
COMMENT: EGW
has no problem interpreting "within the veil" correctly here compared
to pages 420-421. Also she stops at the altar of incense instead of proceeding
to the remainder of the sanctuary per 16:16.
Gc419:
"And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and
confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their
transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and
shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness: and the goat
shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited. Verses 21,
22. The scapegoat came no more into the camp of Israel, and the man who led him
away was required to wash himself and his clothing with water before returning
to the camp.
COMMENT: Instead
of being a reference to Satan, being "presented alive before the
LORD" insures that the scapegoat is a holy living sacrifice "to make
an atonement with him" (16:10; Nu 18:9). The fact that neither the high
priest nor the man who led the goat out were required to offer sin offerings
after their tasks proves that they were not handling sin (16:24, 26). Both only
had to wash.
Gc419-420:
The whole ceremony was designed to impress the Israelites with the holiness of
God and His abhorrence of sin; and, further to show them that they could not
come in contact with sin without becoming polluted. Every man was required to
afflict his soul while the work of atonement was going forward. All business
was to be laid aside, and the whole congregation of Israel were to spend the
day in solemn humiliation before God, with prayer, fasting and deep searching
of heart.
COMMENT:
The Day of Atonement was symbolic of one final Judgment Day in which God would
once-for-all time deal with sin (Heb 10:1-14). Israelites afflicted their souls
to reveal any residual un-confessed and un-atoned sins from the previous year. Since
SDAs cannot cease doing business every day for over 170 years, the prophetic
symbolism is lost.
GC420: Important
truths concerning the atonement are taught by the typical service. A substitute
was accepted in the sinner's behalf,
COMMENT: Ellen
G. White has changed from saying "the blood represents the forfeited life
of the victim" to the correct saying "a substitute was accepted in
the sinner's behalf."
GC420: … but
the sin was not canceled by the blood of the victim.
COMMENT: In
other words, "The perfect sinless blood of Jesus Christ was unable to
completely atone for and wash away sin when first confessed." None dare
ask Ellen G. White "Why not?" The phraseology “and the priest shall
make an atonement for them, and it shall be forgiven” occurs in Leviticus 4:20,
26, 31, 35; 5:10, 13, 16, 18; 6:7; 19:22). Indeed, the sin was canceled because
the debt had been fully paid. The responsibility for the atonement sin was
transferred --- not the sin itself. There is no mention of the transfer of sin
into the sanctuary in the Bible.
GC420: A
means was thus provided by which it was transferred to the sanctuary
COMMENT: Thus
is born the Seventh-day Adventist doctrine of the Investigative Judgment to
remove atoned sins which have defiled the heavenly sanctuary.
GC420: By
the offering of blood the sinner acknowledged the authority of the law,
confessed his guilt in transgression, and expressed his desire for pardon
through faith in a Redeemer to come; but he was not yet entirely released
from the condemnation of the law.
COMMENT: This
is another example of SDA theology at its worst. Ellen G. White failed to grasp
that the sinner was offering the perfect sinless blood of Jesus Christ which
certainly released the sinner from the condemnation of the law. The perfect
sacrifice had been brought and accepted; its life-blood had been shed; the
atonement-redemption price had been fully paid, and the priest had announced
“it shall be forgiven” (Lev 4:26, 31, 35; 5:10, 13, 16, 18; 6:7; 19:22). Yet
EGW erroneously says that the sinner was “not yet entirely released from the
condemnation of the law.” Thus none can be in heaven and none can have
assurance of salvation until their records had been scrutinized sometime after
1844.
GC420: On
the Day of Atonement the high priest, having taken an offering from the
congregation, went into the most holy place with the blood of this offering,
and sprinkled it upon the mercy seat, directly over the law to make
satisfaction for its claims.
COMMENT: This
was a most holy spotless sin offering which had been presented before the LORD
(Lev 16:5, 7; Nu 18:9) and the sins of the congregation confessed over it. Satisfaction
was made the instant the sin offering died (Ex 12:13). Its blood was brought
into the Most Holy Place as proof, or evidence, that the payment had already
been made (Jer 17:1). Since God does not require double atonement for the same
sins, the Day of Atonement ritual was not a second redemption for sins covered
by the daily ministration. This was a final residual cleansing of all remaining
“un-atoned” sinfulness of Israel. Again it was not a cleansing of
previously-atoned sins. Atoned sins are the only ones which do not defile! (See
Lev 15:31; 18:28; Numb 5:2, 3; 19:13; 35:34; compare Lev 16:16-20, 30).
GC420: Then, in
his character of mediator, he took the sins upon himself and bore them from
the sanctuary.
COMMENT: Notice no validating texts. The Bible does not state that the
high priest on the Day of Atonement removed sins from the Most Holy Place. The
residual sins of all Israel had been atoned and washed away the instant the
LORD's goat died at the doorway (Ex 12:13). The record of all atoned sins was
removed from the entire sanctuary --- beginning with the Most Holy Place. Read
Leviticus 16:16. Compare with the last phrase of 1 John 1:9 "If we confess
our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us
from all unrighteousness."
GC420:
Placing his hands upon the head of the scapegoat, he confessed over him all
these sins, thus in figure transferring them from himself to the goat.
The goat then bore them away, and they were regarded as forever separated from
the people.
COMMENT: The
Bible does not say “thus in figure transferring them from himself to the
goat.” EGW said that! Atoned sins never made it past the doorway where the
sacrifice died! And the high priest certainly did not carry “sins” inside the
sanctuary because he would have been defiled and unclean! The scapegoat, the
equal second half of the most holy sin offering from the people (16:7),
presented a visual demonstration to Israel that their sins were forever
removed. “All these sins” refers, not to previously confessed and atoned sin,
but to the residual general sinfulness of Israel. See Lev 16:16-20, 30. Again,
neither the high priest nor person who
handled the second goat was considered defiled afterwards. Since the New
Covenant sanctuary in heaven is not located “in the midst of a sinful people,”
then it does not require a later corresponding Day of Atonement ritual. The
cleansing described in Hebrews 9 is comparable, not to the Day of Atonement,
but to the inauguration to begin the new ministry. Compare Exodus 24:4-8 and 29
with Hebrews 9:17-22.
GC420: Such
was the service performed "unto the example and shadow of heavenly
things."
And what
was done in type in the ministration of the earthly sanctuary is done in
reality in the ministration of the heavenly sanctuary.
COMMENT: The
"real" heavenly sanctuary already existed during Old Testament times.
Did Christ mediate sins since Adam and Eve in it? Was there a yearly Day of
Atonement every year in the heavenly sanctuary? How far do we go with this
"reality" from earthly "examples"?
Since Jesus is both priest and
sacrifice, SDAs inadvertently make Jesus the guilty defiler of the sanctuary!
Their theology has Jesus bearing His own sin-laden blood into the sanctuary and
defiling it.
The vast majority of items, persons,
and activities associated with the physical sanctuary have no relevance to the
heavenly sanctuary because Hebrews, chapter 8, stresses contrasts, not
similarities.
GC420 After His ascension our Saviour began His work as our high priest.
Says Paul: "Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands,
which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself now to appear in the
Presence of God for us." Hebrews 9:24.
COMMENT: How were sins mediated before Calvary? Did Christ forgive on the
premise that He would eventually endure Calvary? (Rom 3:25; Heb 9:15). What did
Christ do in heaven prior to becoming the God-Man?
GC420: [new
paragraph] The ministration of the priest throughout the year in the first
apartment of the sanctuary, “within the veil” which formed the door and
separated the holy place from the outer court, represents the work of
ministration upon which Christ entered at His ascension.
COMMENT:
Only Seventh-day Adventists teach that "within the veil" describes
Christ ministering only in the holy place of the heavenly sanctuary. Their
theology determines their interpretation of Scripture.
GC420-421:
It was the work of the priest in the daily ministration to present before God
the blood of the sin offering, also the incense which ascended with the prayers
of Israel.
GC421: So
did Christ plead His blood before the Father in behalf of sinners, and present
before Him also with the precious fragrance of His own righteousness the
prayers of penitent believers. Such was the work of ministration in the first
apartment of the sanctuary in heaven.
COMMENT: This
is the first time Ellen G. White has referred to the priest as Christ and to
the blood has His blood. It has previously been "the blood represented the
forfeited life of the sinner" (GC418).
GC421: [new
paragraph] Thither [only into the holy place] the faith of Christ's disciples
followed Him as He ascended from their sight. Here their hopes centered,
"which hope we have," said Paul, "as an anchor of the soul, both
sure and steadfast, and which entereth into that within the vail; whither the
forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made a high priest forever.”
COMMENT: This is using one's understanding of the Bible to interpret
it. No other church has dared offer such a different explanation of where Jesus
ascended.
GC421: “Neither
by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once
into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.” Hebrews
6:19, 20; 9:12.
COMMENT:
Compare GC414-415. SDAs are the only group who teach that Christ only
ministered in the Holy Place (instead of the Most Holy Place) from his
ascension until 1844. EGW takes the reference to “within the veil” from Hebrews
6:19 and changes it into the outer veil instead of the inner veil. However,
with one exception (Heb. 9:3), five of six references to “veil” in the New
Testament refer to the veil between the Holy Place and the Most Holy Place ---
not to the curtain separating the Holy Place from the courtyard (Mt 27:51; Mk
15:38; Lk 23:45). Also, the phrase, “within the veil (vail)” occurs six (6)
times in the Old Testament and always
refers to the Most Holy Place, particularly on the Day of Atonement in Leviticus
16. See Ex 26:33; Lev 16:2, 12, 15; Nu 18:7. The phrase, “without the veil
(vail)” occurs four (4) times in the Old Testament and always refers to the
Most Holy Place. See Ex 26:35; 27:21; 40:22; Lev 24:3.
The “holy place” from Hebrews 9:12
(except for SDAs) is universally understood by Greek scholars and Bible
translators as referring to the Most Holy Place (NKJV and NIV) of “heaven
itself” (9:24). Again, the context of Hebrews 9:12 is that of inauguration of
the New Covenant and not that of the Day of Atonement. Compare 9:18-21 with
Moses’ inauguration in Exodus 24:3-8.
GC421: [new
paragraph] For eighteen centuries this work of ministration continued [only] in the first apartment of the
sanctuary [the holy place]. The blood of Christ, pleaded in behalf of penitent
believers, secured their pardon and acceptance with the Father, yet their
SINS still remained upon the books of record.
COMMENT: This
is an SDA oddity. While the Father and the Law are located inside the Most Holy
Place, Christ was not there until 1844.
If Christ’s blood “secured their pardon
and acceptance” before their cases were reviewed in the Investigative Judgment,
then why are they in jeopardy again when their cases are reviewed?
GC421: As
in the typical service there was a work of atonement at the close of the year …
COMMENT: Again,
since this was "example of heavenly things" and "pattern fulfillment,"
was there (or is there) a yearly Day of Atonement in the heavenly sanctuary?
GC421: … so
before Christ’s work for the redemption of men is completed there is a work of
atonement for the removal of SIN from the sanctuary.
COMMENT: SDAs teach that Christ's atoning blood must be administered
twice before a person is fully saved.
GC 421: This is the service which began when the 2300 days ended. At that time, as foretold by Daniel
the prophet [GC479; Dan. 7:9, 10], our High Priest entered the most holy, to perform the last division of His
solemn work --- to cleanse the sanctuary.
COMMENT: It
has taken Ellen G. White 421 pages to justify the existence of the Seventh-day
Adventist Church following the great fiasco of 1844. Yet it has already taken
their Omniscient God over 170 years to research the books of heaven to
determine who shall be saved. However, the "one-day" Day of Atonement
prophesied Christ's "one-day" act of once-for-all-time redemption at
Calvary (Heb 9:24-26). The First and Second Angels’ Messages (“from God” EGW
earlier wrote) preached by Miller have now been completely rejected by SDAs and
replaced by the much worse false doctrine of the Investigative Judgment. Daniel
8:14 is now the cornerstone of Seventh-day Adventism.
GC421: [new paragraph] As anciently the SINS of the people were placed by
faith upon the sin offering and through its blood transferred, in
figure, to the earthly sanctuary, so in the New Covenant the SINS of the
repentant are by faith placed upon Christ and transferred, in fact, to the
heavenly sanctuary.
COMMENT: Forget
how bad the SDAs depict the littler horn of pagan and papal Rome. Forget the
change of the Sabbath and the Mark of the Beast. The worst culprit of
Seventh-day Adventism is Jesus Christ Himself who, as priest, in fact takes His own blood containing atoned
sins of the saints and defiles both the sanctuary on earth and the heavenly
sanctuary.
However, atoned sins were not
transferred into either the earthly or heavenly sanctuary. Notice that no text
is ever given for this so-called "transference" of sins! The priests
bore the responsibility for carrying out the atonement ritual but the sins had
already been were atoned and washed by the blood where the sacrifice was made
(Ex 12:13). It is absolutely incredible that SDAs make Jesus Christ the
sinless Substitute and Sacrifice into the culprit responsible for carrying sins
into the heavenly sanctuary and defiling the Most Holy Place in heaven! “Yes,”
they say, the very same atoning and purifying blood of Jesus Christ is also defiling
blood which carries SIN into the holiest place in the Universe and pollutes
it! Therefore the worst offender is not the "little horn" but Jesus
Christ Himself.
GC421-422:
And as the typical cleansing of the earthly was accomplished by the removal of
the SINS by which it had been polluted, so the actual cleansing of the heavenly
is to be accomplished by the removal, or blotting out, of the SINS which are
there recorded.
COMMENT: At
this point EGW does say “sins which are there recorded.” However, all of her
other quotations plainly say “sins” which have “defiled” heaven. Mere “records”
of sins would not defile, yet, according to EGW, heaven is defiled by atoned
sins of believers which were carried there by Jesus through His blood.
GC422: But before
this can be accomplished, there must be an examination of the books of
record to determine who, through repentance and faith in Christ, are
entitled to the benefits of his atonement.
COMMENT: Notice
“to determine.” This cancels the previous statement that “pardon and
acceptance” is already secured (GC421).
Otherwise, there would be no reason to examine the lives of the
faithful. And, by extension, it also means that nobody is in heaven yet because
nobody can claim to have been fully saved before 1844.
GC422: The
cleansing of the sanctuary therefore involves a work of investigation B a work of judgment. This work must
be performed prior to the coming of Christ to redeem His people; for when He
comes, His reward is with Him to give to every man according to his works.
Revelation 22:12.
COMMENT: This
means that nobody has ever been finally saved before they died. The
Investigative Judgment is a fictional doctrine invented by SDAs to justify
their disgrace when Jesus did not return in 1844.
COMMENT: This
error also forced the doctrine of soul-annihilation into existence.
GC422: [new
paragraph] Thus those who followed in the light of prophetic word saw that, instead of coming to the
earth at the termination of the 2300 days in 1844, Christ then entered the most holy place of
the heavenly sanctuary to perform the closing work of atonement preparatory to
his coming.
COMMENT: Only
SDAs call this “the light of prophetic word” instead of their own pathetic
interpretation.
GC422: [new
paragraph] It was seen also that, while the sin offering pointed to Christ as a
sacrifice and the high priest represented Christ as a mediator, the scapegoat
typified Satan, the author of sin, upon whom the SINS of the truly penitent
will finally be placed. When the high priest, by virtue of the blood of the sin
offering, removed the SINS from the sanctuary, he placed THEM upon the
scapegoat.
COMMENT: EGW
does not say (as SDA leaders want to say) that only “Satan’s part” of the sins
were placed on Satan. She clearly says
“the sins” and “them.” Again, atonement blood cleans; it is most holy and does
not defile.
GC422: When
Christ, by virtue of His own blood, removes the SINS of His people from the
heavenly sanctuary at the close of His ministration, He will place THEM upon
Satan, who, in the execution of the judgment, must bear the final penalty.
COMMENT: Among
Christians, only SDAs teach that the scapegoat was Satan.
GC422: The scapegoat was sent away into a land
not inhabited, never to come again into the congregation of Israel. So will
Satan be forever banished from the presence of God and His people, and he will
be blotted from existence in the final destruction of sin and sinners.
COMMENT: As a final review: (1) Both goats were chosen by the
congregation as ONE sin offering (Lev 16:5). (2) When sacrificial animals were
"presented before the LORD" they became "most holy" (Lev
16:7; Nu 18:9). (3) The scapegoat was presented as a living sin offering similar
to Leviticus 14:53. And (4) if the high priest and goat-handler had contacted
sin, they would have been required to bring a sin offering.
CONCLUSION: Chapter 23, What is the
Sanctuary?, The Great Controversy, replaces all of the wickedness of the little
horn, the papacy and the Sabbath-changers with the greatest culprit of all ---
the one responsible for defiling the Most Holy Place of the Universe. That
culprit is Jesus Christ Himself. And Seventh-day Adventists wonder why they are
called a false cult.
Russell Earl Kelly, PHD
russkellyphd@yahoo.com
www.tithing-russkelly.com/sda
No comments:
Post a Comment