Seventh-day
Adventists Teach That Jesus
is the Anti-Christ
Little Horn Who Defiled the Sanctuary in Heaven
By Russell
Earl Kelly, Ph.D.
May 3, 2018
In their effort to explain their
Seventh-day Adventist Investigative Judgment interpretation of Daniel 8:14, the
most bizarre consequence inadvertently equates the actions of Jesus Christ as worse
than those of the Anti-Christ little horn in 8:9-12.
Seventh-day Adventists repeated William
Miller’s faulty principles of interpretation by disconnecting Daniel 8:9-12
from 8:14. Re-connecting the context reveals their greatest error.
HERE’S HOW
THEY DO IT
STEP ONE: Seventh-Day Adventists teach
that pagan Rome (the WHO), the little horn of Daniel 8:9-10 defiled the literal
sanctuary on earth by destroying it in A. D. 70 (the HOW) with its army (the
WHAT).
According to the SDA interpretation
of Daniel 8:9-10, the “prince of the host” who was “cast down” was Jesus
Christ” and God’s literal earthly “sanctuary was cast down” by pagan Rome. Pagan
Rome’s destruction of the Temple is called “desolations” in Daniel 9:26.
STEP TWO: Seventh-Day Adventists very
extensively teach that papal Rome (the WHO), the little horn of Daniel 8:11-12 “cast
down” and defiled the heavenly sanctuary (the WHAT) using its theology and the
confessional to replace Christ’s ministry in heaven (the HOW). This is the most
time-consuming portion of SDA evangelists when preaching on the necessary
cleansing of the sanctuary in Daniel 8. According to the SDA interpretation of
Daniel 7:25; 8:11-13; 2 Thessalonians 2:3-10 and Revelation 13:1-9, the little
horn of pagan Rome merged into the little horn of papal Rome. Papal Rome’s defilement
of the sanctuary is called the “transgression of desolation” in Daniel 8:13 and
the “overspreading of abominations” in Daniel 9:27. The sanctuary has very
definitely been defiled and very definitely requires cleansing.
VALIDATING
SDA DOCUMENTS
“The little horn of chapter eight
‘takes away the daily sacrifice and casts down the ‘place of his sanctuary’
(v11) [papal Rome], but after a period called ‘two thousand and three hundred
days’ (v14), the sanctuary is ‘cleansed” (KJV) or ‘restored to its rightful
state” [by Jesus] (The Seventh-day
Adventist Bible Dictionary, 1960, “little horn,” page 656).
“The two systems [pagan and papal Rome] are mutually exclusive,
since the setting up of the abomination of desolation is accompanied by the
trampling down of the sanctuary (8:13) and by the taking away of the ‘daily’
(11:31; 12:11). This substitute system of worship is abominable, or detestable,
because it stands in implacable opposition to that of the true God. It
desolates the sanctuary by replacing its services with its own. This turn
of events naturally appalls worshipers of the true God. In the symbolic
prophecy of Daniel 8, it is the power represented by the “little horn” that
terminates the worship of the true God in His sanctuary and institutes a false
system of worship in its place (8:9-12). At the end of “two thousand and three
hundred days” the sanctuary was to be cleansed (v 14) by the restoration of the
worship of the true God” (The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Dictionary,
1960, “abomination,” p7).
Notice that the “two systems” are pagan and papal Rome. Jesus’
defilement of the literal sanctuary using atoned sins is not mentioned. Notice
also that the “restoration of true worship” appears to be a reference to all
SDA doctrines rather than removing atoned sins from the sanctuary.
THE PIVOTAL TEXT
Dan 8:13 How long shall be the vision concerning the daily
sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and
the host to be trodden under foot?
First, if Daniel 8:13 belongs to
8:9-12, then 8:14 must remain a discussion of the sanctuary which was defiled
by the little horn of 8:9-12 and 8:14 concerns a cleansing of a sanctuary
defiled by the little horn. Second, if 8:13 only belongs to 8:14, then 8:14 is
a complete disconnect from 8:9-12 and the sanctuary and cleansing of 8:14 have
nothing in common with the little horn of 8:9-12. This is the SDA application. Third,
if 8:13 connects 8:9-12 with 8:14 (as logic dictates) then 8:9-14 is a complete
unit and all of it concerns the cleansing of a sanctuary defiled by the little
horn. Fourth, if the defiling of the sanctuary in 8:9-12 has no relevance to
the cleansing from defilement in 8:14, the discussion of 8:9-12 has no purpose.
A FALSE DOCTRINAL
FOUNDATION
STEP THREE: Seventh-day Adventists
make exceedingly great proclamation that Jesus Christ is the wonderful hero who
first entered the heavenly Most Holy Place in 1844 to begin cleaning the
heavenly sanctuary.
The SDA transformation from 8:9-12 to
8:14 is incredible, bizarre and totally illogical. First, instead of the
sanctuary being defiled by pagan and papal Rome who persecuted believers in 8:9-12,
SDAs make an “about face” 180 degree turn and blame the defilement on the
atoned sins of believers in 8:14! See GC17-422 later.
“WHO brought the atoned sins of
believers into the heavenly sanctuary to defile it?”
This one simple question destroys SDA logic, the Investigative Judgment and the reason for the existence of Seventh-day Adventism. Since the (SDA) defilement of 8:14 is literal and has already taken over 170 years to complete, Jesus Himself MUST be a far worse defiler of the sanctuary than pagan and papal Rome combined! Like it or not, admit it or not, Seventh-day Adventists inadvertently teach that Jesus Christ is the WHO, the worst of three defilers of the sanctuary in Daniel 8:9-14. SDAs teach that Jesus (the WHO) carried (transferred) atoned sins into the heavenly sanctuary (the WHAT) and defiled it by sprinkling His blood before the Most Holy Place (the HOW). That is SDA theology at its very worst. The “transgression of desolation” against the “sanctuary” in 8:13 must be the context of the question asked in Daniel 8:13 which is answered in 8:14.
Therefore, the greatest “truth” of
Seventh-day Adventism is actually its greatest error. This error was caused by
completely separating Daniel 8:14 from its context. While most SDAs know WHAT and
HOW (SDAs teach) the heavenly sanctuary was defiled, they have ignored the
extremely obvious WHO of Jesus Christ. Jesus is made hero cleansing the sanctuary,
but not villain for defiling it with His same time sacrificial blood.
THE EVIDENCE
FROM ELLEN G. WHITE
The SDA Bible Commentary, The SDA Bible Dictionary and SDA evangelists go into great
detail describing the terrible deeds
of the pagan and papal Roman little horns who defiled the sanctuary in Daniel
8:9-12. Next, they even more vigorously hide the fact that the defiler of Daniel
8:14 must be worse because he literally and physically defiled heaven itself,
the very sanctuary of God. .
The most respected and deliberately mass-distributed
SDA publication is Ellen G. White’s, The
Great Controversy. Yet, in 719 pages their prophetess does not quote or
reference Daniel 8:9-13. Although she
refers to the papal little horn of Daniel 7:25 four times, not a word is said
about the little horn of Daniel 8:9-13 defiling the heavenly sanctuary and thus
requiring it to be cleansed from the little horn’s defilement.
I urge all Seventh-day Adventists to
carefully read every word of chapter 23 in The
Great Controversy, What is the sanctuary?, pages 409-422.
GC418: … The blood,
representing the forfeited life of the sinner, whose guilt the victim bore, was
carried by the priest into the holy place, and sprinkled before the veil,
behind which was the ark containing the law that the sinner had transgressed. By
this ceremony the sin was, through the blood, transferred in figure to
the sanctuary. … Both ceremonies alike symbolized the transfer of the
sin from the penitent to the sanctuary.
(1) Sacrificial blood does NOT
represent the “forfeited life of the sinner”; it represents the substitute life
of the sacrifice (Jesus Christ). (2) Sacrificial blood washes away sins; it
does NOT symbolize the transference of SIN “from the penitent to the
sanctuary.” Rather it records the fact that full atonement has been made by the
perfect sinless sacrifice (Jesus Christ). (4) The phrases “carried by the
priest,” “by this ceremony the sin was through the blood transferred in figure
to the sanctuary” and “transfer of the sin from the penitent to the sanctuary”
should prove SDAs teach that Jesus defiled the heavenly sanctuary even worse
than pagan or papal Rome. And the SDA Jesus qualifies to be called the
Anti-Christ little horn who defiled the sanctuary in heaven which He has been cleaning
since 1844. According to SDAs, Christ blood simultaneously defiles and cleans.
GC419: Such was the
work that went on day by day throughout the year. The sins of Israel were
thus transferred to the sanctuary, and a special work became necessary for
their removal. God commanded that an atonement be made for each of
the sacred apartments. …
(1) If atoned redeemed forgiven sins of
believers defile the sanctuary daily, then the heavenly sanctuary has been defiled
since Adam was forgiven in Genesis 4:21 and is still being defiled every time a
believer is forgiven even today. (2) The Day of Atonement ended a year-end
final cleansing of confessed residual sins (Lev 23:24-32). Confessed sins were
washed away when the blood of the sacrifice was shed (Lev 4:20). (3) SDA theology
denies that the Holy Place and the remainder of the sanctuary were also defiled
and required cleansing on the one-day Day of Atonement because Jesus had been
in the Holy Place before 1844 and because it is still defiled by current
forgiven sins (their theory) (Lev 16:20). (4) The sentence “The sins of Israel
were thus transferred to the sanctuary” proves that SDAs make Jesus a greater
defiler of the heavenly sanctuary than pagan or papal Rome and a worse Anti-Christ
little horn.
GC420: A substitute
was accepted in the sinners behalf, but the sin was not
canceled by the blood of the victim. A means was thus provided by which it
was transferred to the sanctuary. … On the Day of Atonement, the
high priest, having taken an offering from the congregation, went into the most
holy place with the blood of this offering, and sprinkled it upon the mercy
seat, directly over the law to make satisfaction for its claims.
(1) Here Ellen G. White correctly calls
the sacrifice a Substitute; previously she erroneously said it represented the
forfeited life of the sinner. (2) It is wrong to teach that the Christ’s blood
does not entirely cancel sin; the one price had been paid at Calvary and a life
had been given. (3) Like the daily offerings, the Day of Atonement “offering
from the congregation” contained the confessed residual sins of the nation (Lev
23:29). Therefore, if the daily offerings defiled the sanctuary, so would the
yearly. (4) The sentence “A means was thus provided by which it was transferred
to the sanctuary” refers to the “means,” Jesus Christ, via His sinless (yet sin-carrying)
blood. E. G. W. and SDAs dare not say that Jesus is the “means,” the “who” by whom
the heavenly sanctuary was defiled. Such admission would destroy Seventh-day
Adventism.
GC421: As anciently
the sins of the people were placed by faith upon the sin offering and through
its blood transferred, in figure, to the earthly
sanctuary, so in the new covenant the sins of the repentant are by faith
placed upon Christ and transferred, in fact, to the heavenly sanctuary.
(1) Again, sin did not go beyond the
door of the tabernacle where the sacrificial victim died. Only unatoned sins
defile. Sacrificial blood “records” that the payment for sin had been made (Ex
12:13; Jer 17:1; Lev 4:20). (2) The phrase “in the new covenant the sins of the
repentant are by faith placed upon Christ and transferred in fact to the heavenly sanctuary”
clearly teaches that Jesus is even today (long after 1844), still defiling the
heavenly sanctuary while He is unable as Omniscient God to complete its
cleansing quickly. (5) Much more than mere records of sins, E. G. W. makes it
absolutely clear the sins ‘in fact’ are still defiling the heavenly sanctuary.
(6) The combined abominations of desolation by the little horn of pagan and
papal Rome do not compare to the defilement of Jesus Himself. .
GC421: For eighteen
centuries this work of ministration continued in the first apartment of the
sanctuary [the holy place]. The blood of Christ, pleaded in behalf of
penitent believers, secured their pardon and acceptance with the Father, yet
their sins still remained upon the books of record. … there is a work of atonement
for the removal of SIN from the sanctuary. This is the service which began when
the 2300 days ended. …
(1)
SDAs do not discuss when the first compartment was cleansed to allow Christ to
minister there. If part of the sanctuary was defiled, all of it was defiled. In
Leviticus 16 the Most Holy Place was cleansed before the Holy Place; SDAs
reverse the sequence. (2) The blood of Christ does not (at the same time) both “secure
pardon” and defile the sanctuary. (3) Records of sin do not defile. (4) If the
work of atonement was “the removal of sin from the sanctuary,” Daniel 8:9-13
makes no sense if the sanctuary was not being cleaned from its defilement by the
un-atoned sins of pagan and papal Rome. (5) Whether for dedication,
re-dedication or Day of Atonement cleansing, each only lasted one day as Daniel
8:14 teaches – not “begin to be cleansed” as SDAs teach. Even their
“day-for-a-year principle would only extend to one year --- 1844-1845. (6) The
phrase “there is a work of atonement for the removal of sin from the sanctuary”
credits Jesus with beginning to cleanse the sanctuary but He is never credited
with defiling it.
GC421-422: And as the
typical cleansing of the earthly was accomplished by the removal of the sins by
which it had been polluted, so the actual cleansing of the heavenly is to be
accomplished by the removal, or blotting out, of the sins which are there
recorded.
It
is utter folly to think that God would allow the Most Holy Place in the
universe to be defiled. The entire Investigative Judgment doctrine is the
result of fatalistic clinging to William Miller’s false prophecy that Daniel
8:14 pointed to some great event in 1844.
Only unatoned sin defiles. “Defile”
is the same as “casting down” in the context of Daniel 8:9-12. In Exodus 31:14
one who did not keep the Sabbath “defiled” it and was put to death. In
Leviticus 21 priests who touched dead relatives were defiled and unfit to serve.
In Numbers 19:13, 20-21 those who refused to purify themselves defiled the
tabernacle, or sanctuary. In Nehemiah 13:29 those who marred unbelievers
defiled the priesthood. In Revelation 21:27 nothing that defiles will enter heaven.
Run away from any church which teaches that Jesus has defiled heaven with the
atoned sins of believers.
Russell Earl Kelly, PHD
Author of: Exposing Seventh-day Adventism
No comments:
Post a Comment